Calvin Klein Men's Cotton Classics 3-Pack Knit Boxer

Why did you pick this product vs others?:My husband had bought the same ones in the past and they are his most comfortable underwear.

good

These are super comfortable and great for pricing!

A quality product in every way. I dropped it to four stars because of the fit. I didn't want the boxer-briefs so I opted for this boxer... described as "Button fly, straight legs". Straight? Not really. If you like wearing a skirt, you'll love these "boxers".

Got this for my husband and he loves them. Really comfortable and looks good.

Comfy and true to size

Thank you for sending me the ones from Vietnam and not Bangladesh there is a major difference.

Picture: Behind the new size M (32-34 waist) CK boxers are an older pair of XL (40-42 waist) looney toons boxers and another new pair of Polo boxers, size L (36-38 waist). You will notice the Polo's are slightly longer (old boxers' waist band is folded down, out of the way, for visual). What is not obvious is the fact that all three pairs have almost identical width. And just like the Polo's, you can see the excessive amount of extra material sewn under the CK waist band. Apparently, some overpaid, undereducated, decision maker at CK still wears tube socks and thinks they're comfortable. Give us a break! We the consumers, the source of your paychecks, deserve better than tube socks and baggy diaper boxers. Making one size fits all boxers and simply changing the waist band to fit different sizes is lazy and cheap! And really shows how poorly CK's executives think of their customers. Polo, as you can see from the picture, is doing the same stupid, cheap, lazy, one-size fits all scheme with their boxers too. Oh yeah, last but not least, the CK boxers have no legs at the crotch, so they literally ride up the inside of your legs as soon as you put pants on. LAZY AND CHEAP IS ALL I CAN SAY!