A Way of Being

This is one of my favourite books by Carl R Rogers. It is beautifully written and clear to understand. I first read it over 15 years ago and find myself returning to it over the years. I would highly recommend it for anyone who wishes to develop their self awareness.

I have read a huge amount of material to improve my mental health, and to improve my ability to support others; CBT, DBT, ACT, Transactional Analysis, Psychodynamic/Psychoanalytic, amongst many others. Carl Rogers’ approach, in my opinion, is so much superior to every other method I have read that there is truly no comparison. I do not mean to slight other approaches-they may well help others-but for me, the Rogerian method is by far and away the best. Why do I think so? For example, Rogers’ method emphasises a humanistic method of listening to others, and, as much as possible, trying to be completely honest with yourself and others about exactly what you think and feel (what he terms Congruence). The listening style he teaches has VASTLY improved my ability to communicate with literally everyone I meet in my life; encouraging people to be honest, and to try and understand what they mean/believe in THEIR OWN words and from THEIR OWN perspective can and very often does quickly form bonds between you and others. Not to mention opening your mind to someone else’s ‘universe.’ As to Congruence, I have to be brave to practise this one! Being honest when you suspect or even know that your thoughts/feelings will be rejected is incredibly hard, but I have found it to be far better than hiding my true self, or pretending to be happy when I am sad: I think the trick is to gently, politely reveal any thoughts and feelings that you know are likely to meet with resistance (or even hostility), and to commit to not reverting back to ‘going along to get along,’ hiding your true feelings etc. This honesty improves depth in relationships, and makes it much easier to grow and progress in life. There is a LOT more to his teaching, and I would highly recommend this to absolutely everyone. Finally, as incredible as it seems, I agree with the title of this book; this can truly be a way of being, a way that is not artificial, or restrictive, or false, or mechanical. Rather, a way of enabling you to continually develop as a person in every way that you can possibly imagine. PS sorry for all the capitalisation (I couldn’t find a way of italicising the words I wanted to emphasise)…

This was the first book by Rogers that I read. I read it earlier this year, whilst doing my Certificate course in counselling. As someone who was just beginning her long journey into the counselling world, I have to say I thoroughly enjoyed it - it helped to redefine to me the reasons why I was drawn to the profession in the first place. I think what I'm trying to say here is that I found this book at the right time in my life. As I was reading, I was not just appraising it from the hopeful counsllor in me, but at the time I was experiencing a painful relationship. In this relationship, I felt as though I was never properly listened to - if ever I expressed feeling hurt to my partner, my emotions were used by him as a way of attacking me, thus making me feel even more unloved and unappreciated, but bound to stay so as not to be alone. Reading this book, I began to see how abusive this relationship actually was. I actually think I appreciated this book more on my personal level than on the academic level which brought me to it originally. This book does not really offer advice for new counsellors on how to work with their clients. The only advice it gives about that is that the therapeutic relationship should involve empathy, congruence and unconditional positive regard - if these core conditions are present, then the person seeking help is being offered the best environment for change to occur. However, although this work does not necessarily offer a counselling model to work by, what Rogers does illustrate is that people need to be 'allowed' to have feelings in order for them to properly function. If someone feels as though they need to hide or suppress their emotions, so as not to anger or hurt someone else, they are not allowing themselves to be the person they truly are. While clients seeking counselling most likely will have experienced something like this, all counsellors are only human too - before looking at their clients and asking how they cn help them, perhaps counsellors should read this and then ask themselves how they may help themselves! I salute Rogers for writing so honestly, not just about his experiences as a therapist, but as a person too. This book has shown that we would all do well to try and bring his core conditions into our lives as a whole, not just to the counselling room.

This book was a good read but it did not teach me anything I did not already know but that is because I have learned many healing practices and read many many books. If you are interested in Carl Rogers and person centred appraoch to life it is one to have and to learn how he got to be the founder of pcc and his journey . if you are new to the concept of person centred approach it is a must have and also person centred counselling in actioin By D Mearnes is a must have also. If you are new to learning more about your true self and yours or others feelings and how or why they may act, this is a good starting book. I would recommend this book to all students of counselling, counsellors and people who would like to know them selves a bit better also anyone who is interested in people and why we are the way we are.

Esse livro traz à consciência aspectos que definem e avançam o desenvolvimento da consciência humana como um processo de auto aceitação e compaixão pelo próximo. Se você vê o mundo de hoje adotar como moda as palavras empatia e tolerância, então talvez descubra uma parte de onde veio essa nova onda (não que eu abomine essas duas ideias, apenas não acredito na sinceridade que se pretendem transmitir ao usá-las - por isso chamo isso de moda, desviando as palavras dele tanto do significado inicial que chegam a fazer pouco e as vezes ate nenhum sentido correspondente às ideias originais do livro.)

Für Interessenten an Roger's klientenzentrierter Methodik und alle in den psychosozialen Berufen tätigen ein spannender Einblick in Rogers Gedankenwelt. Hier findet man weniger die theoretischen Abhandlungen, die man in anderen Büchern zum Thema ohnehin findet, sondern seine persönlichen Gedanken, Erfahrungen, Gefühle zum Thema Therapie, Wissenschaft, Lebenswelt, Menschlichkeit, etc. Es hat mich sehr berührt, wie spirituell er seinen Zugang eigentlich selbst gesehen hat und wie wichtig ihm die Menschen und die Menschlichkeit immer waren. Es war eine großartige Leistung, diese Herangehensweise gegen das damals (und eigentlich auch heute noch) vorherrschende direktive Behandlungparadigma von Experte/Arzt vs. Laie/Patient zu etablieren und salonfähig zu machen. Es steckt sehr viel Tiefe und Philosophie in den paar Schlagwörtern "Kongruenz, Empathie, Akzeptanz", mit denen der personen/klientenzentrierte Ansatz oft verkürzt abgehandelt wird. Und es gibt keine Therapierichtung und keine Kommunikationssituation, wo dieser Ansatz nicht relevant wäre.

This book contains many inspiring stories and insights human nature. I enjoyed most of it. Some parts seem now to be overly optimistic visions of a future as Carl saw it. I’d like to know to what extent his teaching methods have taken root, I don’t work in education, but I’ve not heard of them so I assume they have fallen by the wayside. I hope I’m wrong because they sound wonderful. On the other hand, his ideas of “leaderless groups” appears to exist in a modern software development team methodology known as Scrum, so perhaps his ideas have found expression there. I hope so. This book presents a very positive view of human potential and ability.

If you're wanting an introduction to Roger's approach and philosophy, this is not it. The collection of mostly autobiographical essays cover his challenges, his achievements and very little on detailed patient outcomes. Was hoping for something more but perhaps it's my mistake.

Actually I'd forgotten I had it. I don't normally order books from Kindle--I spend entirely too much screen time--but I need something to read at various appointments and I don't want to lug a book there. I gave it 5* because that was the consensus, it's not controversial that this is a historic book, and I agree with Rogers theoretically. Sometimes the Kindle version is "off"--I've read enough of it to know that that's not the case. I do have it teed up as my next read behind The Handmaid's Tale.