Smart Scale FSA&HSA Eligible, 8 Electrodes Digital Bathroom Scale for Body Weight and Fat, BMI, Muscle Mass 28 Body Composition Measurement, with Full-Color TFT LCD on Retractable Handle

I have been trying to eat healthier, lose weight, and get stronger and this has been an amazing tool for me! It’s so easy to set up in the app and it takes very little time to scan your body and deliver accurate results. You can use it for multiple people on your family. It’s light weight and easy to store. Great value for what you pay. I love that I can see a snapshot of my results on the screen of the scale before seeing more in depth results in the app. Syncing to other apps such as Apple Health is also a bonus.

Im starting my weightloss journey and this scale is super cool! I love the apps easy navigation and the detailed instructions the scale came with. It supports offline mode so I dont have to open the app everytime I step on the scale and it automatically tracks my data. Im gonna go to my gym and compare the stats to see its accuracy and I will report back!

Why didnt i get one of these sooner!?! Super easy to set up and gives quick results. The screen is bright and breeze to read. Being able to measure my body fat, muscle mass, water levels, have been sooo useful for health tracking. This is essential in monitering my overall health. The app adds another layer to track your daily readings

I got the Run Star Smart Scale and the Fit Index Smart Scale - both of them in the 8 electrode models with the handle bars, as an upgrade to my previous 4 electrode Fit Index Smart Scale. I had them both arrive by the day I was getting a DEXA scan so that I could compare their accuracy. Here are my key takeaways: - Nothing replicates a DEXA scan at home, which I already suspected, but I do think smart scales have a place for tracking trends in-between less frequent DEXA scans. - There is a huge difference between a 4 electrode model and an 8 electrode model. My numbers changed SUBSTANTIALLY when upgrading from 4 to 8 electrodes, within the same brand. The new 8 electrode scale compared to my old data with the 4 electrode version and it was so different, the scale verified I was even the same person!!! Multiple categories’ classifications were changed (as in- good/bad status changed) with the new info. So really, if you want a smart scale, I think there’s no point to get one if it’s not an 8 electrode one. 😳 - The numbers between the two new (8 electrode) scales were close-ish to each other, but both were a little bit further from the DEXA number than I’d like. For example, in most categories the 2 scales were within 1-2 points/percent of each other, but were 6-7 points/percent off of the correct DEXA number. This was the case with Body Fat Percentage (6% off), Body Fat Mass (7% off), and lean muscle mass (9lbs off if I’m comparing the right numbers). - I couldn’t verify everything because some categories (like visceral fat) they use an entirely different ranking system that doesn’t compare to DEXA. Other categories (like water, muscle rate/percentage, bone mass) were not included on DEXA or I was unable to locate them. DEXA also didn’t give me a protein level, but bloodwork from a couple months ago indicated it was “good”, and so did both scales. Again the rankings used were different and didn’t compare, because the scales said 11.7 & 12.4% but bloodwork said 7.1. (not a percentage). But as both put me in “normal” range I figure it’s still in the close-ish category. - DEXA reports are way more annoying to try to decipher and figure out what they mean. The reports given from both scales are way more user-friendly. That said, I found the Run Star scale to be slightly more user-friendly. Its advantages included marking “bad” rankings in red (not just yellow/orange), making them easier to spot and obviously “bad.” Also the body images themselves are color-coded by limb/area, making it quick to see what’s “good” or “bad” instead of having a gray body image and having subtle color-coded word explanations to the side. - The biggest advantage I found to the Run Star scale was that they had better, more thorough explanations for each category than the Fit Index did. Where Fit Index may give a one-sentence explanation of what something is, the Run Star would tell you more about it, as well as giving a lengthier explanation of what to do to improve this number if yours is bad. I appreciate that! - Overall, Fit Index is a much less expensive scale, and most of its numbers/readings are pretty comparable to Run Star, but it doesn’t give you the extra info about each score or how to improve it, and it’s color coding is just a bit more subtle. I prefer the red to stand out as bad so I don’t have to hunt for it between similar intensity colors, none of which really stand out. So really the things I don’t like about Fit Index could be fixed with an app update, should the company choose to do so. Fit Index, if you’re reading this, if you update your app, send me a scale & I’ll update this review! 😉 - The main thing that stood out between the two scales as being significantly wrong is the fact that their Subcutaneous fat numbers were so far apart. Most ratings were very close to each other, but this category had an 8% difference! I wish I was able to know which one was more accurate, since that would have been my deciding factor. Unfortunately the DEXA scan I got didn’t give me that number so I don’t know the winner/loser in that category. Most other categories were within 1 point/percent of each other, though neither was right on target, so I considered the scales comparable to each other but not a replacement for DEXA. The only other categories that were further than 1 point/percent apart between the two scales were basal metabolic rate, metabolic age (2 points/years difference, so still pretty close), and waist-to-hip ratio (.18 off, which is a lot when the numbers are 1 or less!) - Since I don’t know which one was right/wrong on the subcutaneous fat score (the only notably different score between the 2 scales), I chose which scale to keep based on my preference for Run Star scale’s app. I preferred its readability and color coding and appreciated their lengthier explanations of each rating. It’s a bummer because my old data is saved in the Fit Index scale app already, but I just really like having the extra info there. So I’m keeping the pricier one of the two. But if you want to save money I think Fit Index is a comparable scale at a lower price point. I just don’t know which one was so far off on the one ranking of subcutaneous fat.

Before purchasing this type of scale, it’s important to understand what it is—and what it is not. This is not a diagnostic tool. It is not a reliable measure of overall health for all body types. And it should not be used to set personal weight or fat percentage goals without medical or clinical oversight. For individuals with a history of body dysmorphia, eating disorders, or obsessive tendencies around weight or appearance, this device could reinforce harmful behaviors. The language used (terms like “obese,” “plump,” or “overweight”) is blunt, potentially misleading, and based on outdated classification models. These may trigger or validate distorted body perceptions, especially for users unfamiliar with how these values are calculated or misapplied. ⸻ What the Scale Does Well This is a consumer-grade bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) tool that estimates body composition by measuring the resistance of tissue to a small electrical current. It does a reasonable job at: • Estimating body fat percentage • Breaking down segmental muscle mass (arms, legs, trunk) • Reporting total body water, visceral fat grade, and protein/muscle mass • Offering trend tracking if used consistently (same time of day, same hydration state) For individuals who are emotionally grounded and experienced in reading their own data, this can be a helpful tracking device over time. ⸻ Where It Falls Short The core issue lies in its reliance on population-based models (like BMI, WHR, and body fat norms) to interpret results. These models are known to misclassify: • Muscular or athletic individuals • People with large frames or dense bone structure • Individuals who have undergone major weight loss but retained high lean mass For example, someone with high muscle mass and low metabolic risk factors may be flagged as “obese” or given a goal weight that is inappropriate for their frame. Scientific literature has long criticized BMI and similar tools for overestimating obesity in high-muscle individuals and underestimating risk in lean-appearing but metabolically unhealthy ones. ⸻ Bottom Line This scale can be a helpful tool for trend tracking, especially when used with clinical support or by informed users. But it should not be used to define health, appearance, or self-worth. For vulnerable users, the risk of misinterpretation is real and significant. Health is multifactorial. No single number—or app screen—tells the full story.

I work in a weight management clinic and we have a fancy BMI weight to measure every thing. Also this scale uses an app to track of everything in detail if you wanna be fancy. Otherwise it goes into detail of your weight, metabolic , bone mass, fat mass, etc. it’s worth the purchase to see your weight loss journey !

The scale is the real deal.. For BMI it's accurate. Solid Construction the handle is great to have and will be super helpful in weight loss Journey

Makkelijk te installeren en te gebruiken. Erg tevreden.

Works right out of the box. Easy to set up and use for multiple people. Information is clear and seems quite accurate.

Salire su questa bilancia è come salire sulla bilancia della nutrizionista, cambierà il modello ma le funzioni sono quelle. Si impugna il il manubrio della bilancia e secondo dopo secondo i parametri rilevati appaiono su display della bilancia e trasferiti tramite Bluetooth allo smartphone associato e visualizzabile tramite l'app Starfit. Si tratta di una bilancia impedenziometrica per il peso corporeo facile da usare. Per usare la bilancia impedenziometrica è necessario nel limite del possibile essere sempre nelle stesse condizioni: se non è possibile accedervi lo stesso giorno della settimana, meglio scegliere un altro momento che abbia le stesse caratteristiche di quello precedente. Bisogna essere nudi e suggerisco di togliete eventuali collane, orecchini, anelli. Inserire correttamente i dati richiesti dall'apparecchio: età, sesso, statura ecc. Impugnare il manubrio dove sono presenti gli elettrodi oltre a quelli sulla bilancia e ripetere la misurazione almeno 2 volte per assicurarsi della validità dei dati. La bilancia misurerà il rapporto tra la massa priva di grasso e la massa grassa e relative percentuali, entità della massa muscolare, il rapporto tra il cosiddetto grasso essenziale – necessario alla sopravvivenza – e quello adiposo – viscerale e sottocutaneo e relative percentuali. Quantità di grasso addominale e relativa circonferenza, con maggior attenzione a quello viscerale, la massa dello scheletro e importanza sul peso – detta costituzione, la quantità d'acqua, sia dentro che fuori dalle cellule, la massa cellulare, gli elettroliti ecc. Si possono impostare 24 profili utilizzando un singolo account dell'APP Starfit. Bilancia assai utile per monitorare lo stato di salute.

Una maravilla de báscula, completisima para un seguimiento de constantes que no sabía ni que existían, es cara pero el precio lo vale

La balance est simple à utiliser et donne des mesures claires grâce à son écran couleur lisible, la prise en main est pratique avec la poignée rétractable qui facilite l’analyse corporelle, les différentes données comme le poids, l’IMC et la masse grasse permettent un suivi régulier et motivant, la connexion avec l’application fonctionne bien et aide à visualiser l’évolution dans le temps, la plateforme est stable et inspire confiance à l’utilisation, en revanche certaines mesures peuvent légèrement varier selon la position ou l’heure de la pesée ce qui reste normal pour ce type d’appareil, dans l’ensemble c’est un outil complet et efficace pour surveiller ses données corporelles au quotidien